<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview With William Doll, Director of SolidWorks Labs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/</link>
	<description>Welcome to CADFanatic - A Blog About SolidWorks &#38; the 3D CAD Industry in General</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:35:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Yodis</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Yodis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cadfanatic.com/?p=825#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Does William have any information for us on whats happening with WorkGroup PDM.  William moves onto the Labs division from WorkGroup.  WorkGroup PDM gets no improvements in 2009.  The product offering is really removed (or at least not advertised on SolidWorks site).  SolidWorks doesn&#039;t have a clear position on this.  The VARs are even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does William have any information for us on whats happening with WorkGroup PDM.  William moves onto the Labs division from WorkGroup.  WorkGroup PDM gets no improvements in 2009.  The product offering is really removed (or at least not advertised on SolidWorks site).  SolidWorks doesn&#39;t have a clear position on this.  The VARs are even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Yodis</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Yodis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cadfanatic.com/?p=825#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Does William have any information for us on whats happening with WorkGroup PDM.  William moves onto the Labs division from WorkGroup.  WorkGroup PDM gets no improvements in 2009.  The product offering is really removed (or at least not advertised on SolidWorks site).  SolidWorks doesn&#039;t have a clear position on this.  The VARs are even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does William have any information for us on whats happening with WorkGroup PDM.  William moves onto the Labs division from WorkGroup.  WorkGroup PDM gets no improvements in 2009.  The product offering is really removed (or at least not advertised on SolidWorks site).  SolidWorks doesn&#39;t have a clear position on this.  The VARs are even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Yodis</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Yodis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cadfanatic.com/?p=825#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Does William have any information for us on whats happening with WorkGroup PDM.  William moves onto the Labs division from WorkGroup.  WorkGroup PDM gets no improvements in 2009.  The product offering is really removed (or at least not advertised on SolidWorks site).  SolidWorks doesn&#039;t have a clear position on this.  The VARs are even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does William have any information for us on whats happening with WorkGroup PDM.  William moves onto the Labs division from WorkGroup.  WorkGroup PDM gets no improvements in 2009.  The product offering is really removed (or at least not advertised on SolidWorks site).  SolidWorks doesn&#39;t have a clear position on this.  The VARs are even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cadfanatic.com/?p=825#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian, I never knew who was behind the labs group but now I do.  I have tried many of the things that they have come out with and I like the whole idea.  They are very innovative and if they are left to do their inventive creations we will have some very nice add ons for later versions.  Great little group and now I know how small it really is.  Great work guys and gals.  Thanks Brian for doing this little article.  We should have more revelations like this about the SolidWorks people we never hear about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian, I never knew who was behind the labs group but now I do.  I have tried many of the things that they have come out with and I like the whole idea.  They are very innovative and if they are left to do their inventive creations we will have some very nice add ons for later versions.  Great little group and now I know how small it really is.  Great work guys and gals.  Thanks Brian for doing this little article.  We should have more revelations like this about the SolidWorks people we never hear about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gol10dr</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/interview-with-william-doll-director-of-solidworks-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>gol10dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cadfanatic.com/?p=825#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Great interview.  Sounds like the conversation I had with him as well. Bill is a great guy and the right guy to be running a division like the LABS.  He obviously is an out of the box thinker and I look forward to more out of the LABS site.  It is fun to live on the bleeding edge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview.  Sounds like the conversation I had with him as well. Bill is a great guy and the right guy to be running a division like the LABS.  He obviously is an out of the box thinker and I look forward to more out of the LABS site.  It is fun to live on the bleeding edge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
