<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WikiScanner &#8211; Causing Embarrassment Throughout the Ether?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/</link>
	<description>Welcome to CADFanatic - A Blog About SolidWorks &#38; the 3D CAD Industry in General</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=57#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is anything new, at all.
It&#039;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#039;s what the internet is For. I didn&#039;t look at the data trails, but it&#039;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.

In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#039;t have to!

I was particularly amused by Folini&#039;s &quot;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&quot; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive - by the Corporate IS EVP Android.
They&#039;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is anything new, at all.<br />
It&#8217;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#8217;s what the internet is For. I didn&#8217;t look at the data trails, but it&#8217;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.</p>
<p>In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#8217;t have to!</p>
<p>I was particularly amused by Folini&#8217;s &#8220;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&#8221; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive &#8211; by the Corporate IS EVP Android.<br />
They&#8217;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=57#comment-704</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is anything new, at all.
It&#039;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#039;s what the internet is For. I didn&#039;t look at the data trails, but it&#039;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.

In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#039;t have to!

I was particularly amused by Folini&#039;s &quot;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&quot; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive - by the Corporate IS EVP Android.
They&#039;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is anything new, at all.<br />
It&#8217;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#8217;s what the internet is For. I didn&#8217;t look at the data trails, but it&#8217;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.</p>
<p>In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#8217;t have to!</p>
<p>I was particularly amused by Folini&#8217;s &#8220;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&#8221; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive &#8211; by the Corporate IS EVP Android.<br />
They&#8217;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=57#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is anything new, at all.
It&#039;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#039;s what the internet is For. I didn&#039;t look at the data trails, but it&#039;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.

In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#039;t have to!

I was particularly amused by Folini&#039;s &quot;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&quot; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive - by the Corporate IS EVP Android.
They&#039;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is anything new, at all.<br />
It&#8217;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#8217;s what the internet is For. I didn&#8217;t look at the data trails, but it&#8217;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.</p>
<p>In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#8217;t have to!</p>
<p>I was particularly amused by Folini&#8217;s &#8220;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&#8221; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive &#8211; by the Corporate IS EVP Android.<br />
They&#8217;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=57#comment-705</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is anything new, at all.
It&#039;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#039;s what the internet is For. I didn&#039;t look at the data trails, but it&#039;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.

In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#039;t have to!

I was particularly amused by Folini&#039;s &quot;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&quot; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive - by the Corporate IS EVP Android.
They&#039;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is anything new, at all.<br />
It&#8217;s people bored art work, poking-around the internet. That&#8217;s what the internet is For. I didn&#8217;t look at the data trails, but it&#8217;s highly unlikely that Editing Wikipedia is a line on Any Dept Budget.</p>
<p>In my office, we have a couple of folks that did some editing of our Wikipedia entry, and it was quite obviously people from Marketing. But they did a nice job, nothing too over the top, no flat-out lies, no badmouthing the competition. Hey, they did the world a favor and put-out some very possibly useful information, when they didn&#8217;t have to!</p>
<p>I was particularly amused by Folini&#8217;s &#8220;What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers.&#8221; As-if all activity on Autodesk computers is controlled by the corporate hive &#8211; by the Corporate IS EVP Android.<br />
They&#8217;re people, they get bored at work. Everything is gonna be ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=57#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s slimy and childish. Of course mindless rah-rah-ism marketing is one of the things I rail against frequently. If your product can&#039;t sell on its own merits, then fix your product. Wikipedia is supposed to be objective, grass-roots, informational, non-commercial.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s slimy and childish. Of course mindless rah-rah-ism marketing is one of the things I rail against frequently. If your product can&#8217;t sell on its own merits, then fix your product. Wikipedia is supposed to be objective, grass-roots, informational, non-commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/08/wikiscanner-causing-embarrassment-throughout-the-ether/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=57#comment-706</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s slimy and childish. Of course mindless rah-rah-ism marketing is one of the things I rail against frequently. If your product can&#039;t sell on its own merits, then fix your product. Wikipedia is supposed to be objective, grass-roots, informational, non-commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s slimy and childish. Of course mindless rah-rah-ism marketing is one of the things I rail against frequently. If your product can&#8217;t sell on its own merits, then fix your product. Wikipedia is supposed to be objective, grass-roots, informational, non-commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

