<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SolidWorks 2008 Preview &#8211; Part 2: Large Assembly Management Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/</link>
	<description>Welcome to CADFanatic - A Blog About SolidWorks &#38; the 3D CAD Industry in General</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:35:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bub</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Bub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=42#comment-518</guid>
		<description>The development method at SolidWorks is to layer ad nauseum functionality, nice as it is, and yet not improve the memory management.  2008 sp 5 is wrought with innumerable bugs.  The application behavior suggest bloated, poorly factored code, porrly management memory and object handling as well as managing the relations of any type between these.  It does not help that WinXP is a dog of an OS.  Remember, 8-bit DOS is underneath all Windows versions.  Perhaps the UNIX or WIN SolidWorks builds (common code base, I&#039;d guess) perform better?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHat the heck, long live MacDraw Pro!  Long live the Volvo 240 - Design on PAPER with real MATH and ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The development method at SolidWorks is to layer ad nauseum functionality, nice as it is, and yet not improve the memory management.  2008 sp 5 is wrought with innumerable bugs.  The application behavior suggest bloated, poorly factored code, porrly management memory and object handling as well as managing the relations of any type between these.  It does not help that WinXP is a dog of an OS.  Remember, 8-bit DOS is underneath all Windows versions.  Perhaps the UNIX or WIN SolidWorks builds (common code base, I&#39;d guess) perform better?</p>
<p>WHat the heck, long live MacDraw Pro!  Long live the Volvo 240 &#8211; Design on PAPER with real MATH and ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bub</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Bub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=42#comment-330</guid>
		<description>The development method at SolidWorks is to layer ad nauseum functionality, nice as it is, and yet not improve the memory management.  2008 sp 5 is wrought with innumerable bugs.  The application behavior suggest bloated, poorly factored code, porrly management memory and object handling as well as managing the relations of any type between these.  It does not help that WinXP is a dog of an OS.  Remember, 8-bit DOS is underneath all Windows versions.  Perhaps the UNIX or WIN SolidWorks builds (common code base, I&#039;d guess) perform better?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHat the heck, long live MacDraw Pro!  Long live the Volvo 240 - Design on PAPER with real MATH and ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The development method at SolidWorks is to layer ad nauseum functionality, nice as it is, and yet not improve the memory management.  2008 sp 5 is wrought with innumerable bugs.  The application behavior suggest bloated, poorly factored code, porrly management memory and object handling as well as managing the relations of any type between these.  It does not help that WinXP is a dog of an OS.  Remember, 8-bit DOS is underneath all Windows versions.  Perhaps the UNIX or WIN SolidWorks builds (common code base, I&#39;d guess) perform better?</p>
<p>WHat the heck, long live MacDraw Pro!  Long live the Volvo 240 &#8211; Design on PAPER with real MATH and ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bub</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Bub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=42#comment-82</guid>
		<description>The development method at SolidWorks is to layer ad nauseum functionality, nice as it is, and yet not improve the memory management.  2008 sp 5 is wrought with innumerable bugs.  The application behavior suggest bloated, poorly factored code, porrly management memory and object handling as well as managing the relations of any type between these.  It does not help that WinXP is a dog of an OS.  Remember, 8-bit DOS is underneath all Windows versions.  Perhaps the UNIX or WIN SolidWorks builds (common code base, I&#039;d guess) perform better?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHat the heck, long live MacDraw Pro!  Long live the Volvo 240 - Design on PAPER with real MATH and ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The development method at SolidWorks is to layer ad nauseum functionality, nice as it is, and yet not improve the memory management.  2008 sp 5 is wrought with innumerable bugs.  The application behavior suggest bloated, poorly factored code, porrly management memory and object handling as well as managing the relations of any type between these.  It does not help that WinXP is a dog of an OS.  Remember, 8-bit DOS is underneath all Windows versions.  Perhaps the UNIX or WIN SolidWorks builds (common code base, I&#39;d guess) perform better?</p>
<p>WHat the heck, long live MacDraw Pro!  Long live the Volvo 240 &#8211; Design on PAPER with real MATH and ENGINEERING INSTRUMENTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, CADFanatic</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, CADFanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=42#comment-36</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SolidWorks 2008 Preview - Part 4: COSMOSWorks Designer Enhancements&lt;/strong&gt;

Now we&#039;re getting more into the SolidWorks Premium offerings - Part 4 of my SolidWorks 2008 Preview focuses on the enhancements made to COSMOSWorks Designer. This is also the last preview that focuses on SolidWorks&#039; first goal of helping users
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SolidWorks 2008 Preview &#8211; Part 4: COSMOSWorks Designer Enhancements</strong></p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re getting more into the SolidWorks Premium offerings &#8211; Part 4 of my SolidWorks 2008 Preview focuses on the enhancements made to COSMOSWorks Designer. This is also the last preview that focuses on SolidWorks&#8217; first goal of helping users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, CADFanatic</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/07/solidworks-2008-preview-part-2-large-assembly-management-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, CADFanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=42#comment-35</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SolidWorks 2008 Preview - Part 3: BOM&lt;/strong&gt;

Along with the new large assembly management additions I spoke of in Part 2 of my SolidWorks 2008 Preview, SolidWorks 2008 also features several nifty BOM and drawing enhancements. Drawings have always been one of the things in SolidWorks that
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SolidWorks 2008 Preview &#8211; Part 3: BOM</strong></p>
<p>Along with the new large assembly management additions I spoke of in Part 2 of my SolidWorks 2008 Preview, SolidWorks 2008 also features several nifty BOM and drawing enhancements. Drawings have always been one of the things in SolidWorks that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
