<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MoldflowXpress is No Mo&#8217; in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Welcome to CADFanatic - A Blog About SolidWorks &#38; the 3D CAD Industry in General</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael B</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=24#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Is moldflowxpress able to be composited as an add-on for SW08??
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is moldflowxpress able to be composited as an add-on for SW08??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Gómez</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Gómez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=24#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Huge surprise gave me the 2008 version, I was just about to use the MoldflowXpress as usual and it was&#039;t placed anywhere, we were really used to work this tool. Totally disappointing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge surprise gave me the 2008 version, I was just about to use the MoldflowXpress as usual and it was&#8217;t placed anywhere, we were really used to work this tool. Totally disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=24#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Sounds like it&#039;s time for Solidworks to buy them. :-\
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like it&#8217;s time for Solidworks to buy them. :-\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianmcelyea.com/cadfanatic/?p=24#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Wow....that is really disappointing to hear.  I personally have only used it once or twice and it seemed to work well.

Ricky Jordan
http://www.rickyjordan.net
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.that is really disappointing to hear.  I personally have only used it once or twice and it seemed to work well.</p>
<p>Ricky Jordan<br />
<a href="http://www.rickyjordan.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.rickyjordan.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
